|
|
War
Q-How can we solve our present political chaos and the crisis in the world? Is
there anything an individual can do to stop the impending war?
Krishnamurti: War is the spectacular and bloody projection of our everyday life,
is it not?
War is merely an outward expression of our inward state, an enlargement of our
daily action. It is more spectacular, more bloody, more destructive, but it is
the collective result of our individual activities. Therefore, you and I are
responsible for war and what can we do to stop it? Obviously the ever-impending
war cannot be stopped by you and me, because it is already in movement; it is
already taking place, though at present chiefly on the psychological level. As
it is already in movement, it cannot be stopped- the issues are too many, too
great, and are already committed. But you and I, seeing that the house is on
fire, can understand the causes of that fire, can go away from it and build in a
new place with different materials that are not combustible, that will not
produce other wars. That is all that we can do. You and I can see what creates
wars, and if we are interested in stopping wars, then we can begin to transform
ourselves, who are the causes of war.
An American lady came to see me a couple of years ago, during the
war. She said she had lost her son in Italy and that she had another son aged
sixteen whom she wanted to save; so we talked the thing over. I suggested to
her that to save her son she had to cease to be an American; she had to cease to
be greedy, cease piling up wealth, seeking power, domination, and be morally
simple – not merely simple in clothes, in outward things, but simple in her
thoughts and feelings, in her relationships. She said,” That is too much. You
are asking far too much. I cannot do it, because circumstances are too powerful
for me to alter.” Therefore she was responsible for the destruction of her son.
Circumstances can be controlled by us, because we have created the
circumstances. Society is the product of relationship, society changes; merely
to rely on legislation, on compulsion, for the transformation of outward
society, while remaining inwardly corrupt, while continuing inwardly to seek
power, position, domination, is to destroy the outward, however carefully and
scientifically built. That which is inward is always overcoming the outward.
What causes war – religious, political or economic? Obviously
belief, either in nationalism, in an ideology, or in a particular dogma. If we
had no belief but goodwill, love and consideration between us, then there would
be no wars. But we are fed on beliefs, ideas and dogmas and therefore we breed
discontent. The present crisis is of an exceptional nature and we as human
beings must either pursue the path of constant conflict and continuous wars,
which are the result of our everyday action, or else see the causes of war and
turn our back upon them.
Obviously what causes war is the desire for power, position,
prestige, money; also the disease called nationalism, the worship of a flag; and
the disease of organized religion, the worship of a dogma. All these are the
causes of war; if you as an individual belong to any of the organized religions,
if you are greedy for power, if you are envious, you are bound to produce a
society which will result in destruction. So again it depends upon you and not
on the leaders – not on so-called statesmen and all the rest of them. It
depends upon you and me but we do not seem to realize that. If once we really
felt the responsibility of our own actions, how quickly we could bring to an end
all these wars, this appalling misery! But you see, we are indifferent. We have
three meals a day, we have our jobs, we have our bank account, big or little,
and we say, “For God’s sake, don’t disturb us, leave us alone”. The higher up
we are, the more we want security, permanency, tranquility, the more we want to
be left alone, to maintain things fixed as they are; but they cannot be
maintained as they are, because there is nothing to maintain. Everything is
disintegrating. We do not want to face these things, we do not want to face the
fact that you and I are responsible for wars. You and I may talk about peace,
have conferences, sit round a table and discuss, but inwardly, psychologically,
we want power, position, we are bound by beliefs, by dogmas, for which we are
willing to die and destroy each other. Do you think such men, you and I, can
have peace in the world? To have peace, we must be peaceful; to live peacefully
means not to create antagonism. Peace is not an ideal. To me, an ideal is
merely an escape, an avoidance of what is, a contradiction of what is. An ideal
prevents direct action upon what is - which we will go into presently, in
another talk. [not on this website] But to have peace, we will have to love, we
will have to begin, not to live an ideal life, but to see things as they are and
act upon them, transform them. As long as each one of us is seeking
psychological security, the physiological security we need – food, clothing and
shelter – is destroyed. We are seeking psychological security, which does not
exist; and we seek it, if we can, through power, through position, through
titles, names – all of which is destroying physical security. This is an
obvious fact, if you look at it.
To bring about peace in the world, to stop all wars, there must be a
revolution in the individual, in you and me. Economic revolution without this
inward revolution is meaningless, for hunger is the result of the maladjustment
of economic conditions produced by our psychological states – greed, envy,
ill-will and possessiveness. To put an end to sorrow, to hunger, to war, there
must be a psychological revolution and few of us are willing to face that. We
will discuss peace, plan legislation, create new leagues, the United Nations and
so on and on; but we will not win peace because we will not give up our
position, our authority, our money, our properties, our stupid lives. To rely
on others is utterly futile; others cannot bring us peace. No leader is going
to give us peace, no government, no army, no country. What will bring peace is
inward transformation which will lead to outward action. Inward transformation
is not isolation, is not a withdrawal from outward action. On the contrary,
there can be right action only when there is right thinking and there is no
right thinking when there is no self-knowledge. Without knowing yourself, there
is no peace.
To put an end to outward war, you must begin to put an end to war in
yourself. Some of you will nod your heads and say, “ I agree”, and go outside
and do exactly the same as you have been doing for the last ten or twenty years.
Your agreement is merely verbal and has no significance, for the world miseries
and wars are not going to be stopped by your casual assent. They will be
stopped only when you realize the danger, when you realize your responsibility,
when you do not leave it to somebody else. If you realize the suffering, if you
see the urgency of immediate action and do not postpone, then you will transform
yourself; peace will come only when you yourself are peaceful, when you yourself
are at peace with your neighbour.
1948, second public talk, Bangalore, India; Collected Works of J. Krishnamurti,
Vol V, CD-Rom code BA48T2
Questioner: Why do men fight?
Krishnamurti: why do young boys fight? You sometimes fight with your brother,
or other boys here, don't you? Why? You fight over a toy. Perhaps another boy
has taken your ball, or your book and therefore you fight. Grown-up people fight
for exactly the same reason, only their toys are position, wealth and power. If
you want power and I also want power, we fight, and that is why nations go to
war. It is as simple as that, only philosophers, politicians, and the so-called
religious people complicate it. You know, it is a great art to have an abundance
of knowledge and experience-to know the richness of life, the beauty of
existence, the struggles, the miseries, the laughter, the tears- and yet keep
your mind very simple; and you can have a simple mind only when you know how to
love.
"Think on These Things"(1964,1970 reprint), p. 32
|
|